|
FEATURE: 2005 COST vs. VALUE REPORT
Midrange Major Kitchen Remodel Project Description: Update an outmoded 200-square-foot kitchen with design and installation of a functional layout of 30 linear feet of semicustom-grade wood cabinets, including a 3-by-5-foot island, laminate countertops, and standard double-tub stainless-steel sink with standard single-lever faucet. Include energy-efficient wall oven, cooktop, ventilation system; built-in microwave, dishwasher, garbage disposal; and custom lighting. Add resilient flooring. Finish with painted walls, trim, and ceiling.
Upscale Major Kitchen Remodel Project Description: Update outmoded 200-square-foot kitchen with 30 linear feet of top-of-the-line custom cherry cabinets with built-in sliding shelves and other interior accessories. Include stone countertops with imported ceramic or glass tile backsplash; built-in refrigerator, cooktop, and 36-inch commercial grade range and vent hood; and built-in warming drawer, trash compactor, and combination microwave and convection oven. Install high-end undermount sink with designer faucets and built-in water filtration system. Add general and task lighting, including low-voltage under-cabinet lights. Install cork flooring with cherry trim.
Remodeling magazine, published by Hanley-Wood LLC, has been producing this report annually for 19 years. We’d like to thank the editors and designers of Remodeling, as well as the REALTORS® who contributed to bringing you this report. Remodeling magazine’s “Cost vs. Value Report.” ©2005 by Hanley-Wood LLC. Republication of the report is expressly prohibited without written permission of Hanley-Wood LLC. Order Reprints for Your Clients and Customers Order reprints of the complete 2005 “Cost vs. Value Report”—all 18 projects—for just $6.50 each plus shipping and handling at www.realtorreprints.com. For information on bulk orders over 500, contact Kelly Dewan at kdewan@reprintbuyer.com or 717/399-1900, ext. 166. Take the 2006 Survey Participate in next year’s “Cost vs. Value” survey! Sign up here. Thank you to those practitioners who took the 2005 survey Those survey respondents who also provided their contact information are listed here . Your help on this project was invaluable. * We received sufficient data for 58 out of 60 markets surveyed compared with only 53 last year. Because of insufficient data from Grand Rapids, Mich., and Providence, R.I., no resale value numbers for those markets are provided. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||